Anjali.

little mixed (up) Indian girl. respect my weirdness. SOULED not sold. Sailing NOT selling.

I am one confused, crazy, & mixed up little girl. There is my disclaimer. 😒 *sigh*

Obama Turns Romney Comments On Libya, Iraq, Russia, And Bin Laden Against Him | TPMDC

justinspoliticalcorner:

Throughout Monday night’s presidential debate on foreign policy, President Obama used past positions that Mitt Romney has taken over the course of the campaign to depict him as the wrong candidate to run U.S. foreign policy.

Obama used the tactic both to defend his own initiatives — particularly his Libya policy — and to characterize Romney as an untrained foreign policy hand who has been wobbly and inconsistent.

“I know you haven’t been in a position to execute foreign policy,” Obama said, in summarizing his theme of attack, “but every time you have offered an opinion, you have been wrong.”

Russia

Obama took the chance to needle Romney on his adversarial position on Russia. “I’m glad that you recognize al Qaeda is a threat. Because a few months ago when you were asked the biggest threat facing America, you said Russia,” Obama said. “The Cold War has been over for 20 years. But governor, when it comes to our foreign policy, you seem to want to import the foreign policies of the 1980s, just like the social policies of the 1950s and the economic policies of the 1920s.”

Later Obama said directly to Romney, “You indicated that we shouldn’t be passing nuclear treaties with Russia, despite the fact that 71 senators, Democrats and Republicans, voted for it.”

Libya

Regarding Romney’s campaign positions on the revolution in Libya, Obama said, “[T]o the governor’s credit, you supported us going into [L]ibya and the coalition that we organized,” Obama said. “But when it came time to making sure that Moammar Gaddhafi did not stay in power, that he was captured, governor, your suggestion was that this was mission creep.”

Syria

Responding to Romney’s call for arming Syrian opposition and his critique of the Obama administration’s more cautious policy, Obama noted that “to get more entangled militarily in Syria is a serious step. And we have to do so making absolutely certain that we know who we are helping, that we’re not putting arms in the hands of folks who eventually could turn them against us or allies in the region. I’m confident that Assad’s days are numbered. But what we can’t do is simply suggest that as governor at times as suggested that giving heavy weapons, for example, to the Syrian opposition is a simple proposition that would lead us to be safer over the long-term.”

Osama bin Laden

Obama reprised a familiar line based on Romney’s position in the 2008 campaign that locating and killing Osama bin Laden would not be a top priority.

“[Y]ou said we shouldn’t move heaven and earth to get one man,” Obama said. “If we would have asked Pakistan for permission, we wouldn’t have got him.”

Iraq

“You say that you’re not interested in duplicating what happened in Iraq, but just a few weeks ago, you said you think we should have more troops in Iraq right now,” Obama said pointedly. “You said we should have gone into Iraq despite the fact there were no weapons of mass destruction. You said that we should still have troops in Iraq, to this day.”

Afghanistan

You said that first we should not have a timeline in Afghanistan, then you said we should. Now you say maybe or it depends. Which means not only were you wrong, but you were confused and sending mixed messages to our troops and allies.”

h/t: Brian Beutler at TPM

(via reagan-was-a-horrible-president)

#foodforthought

#foodforthought

youngerthanthemountains:

sourcedumal:

Can we fucking talk about this for a second?

Can we really?

Because this shit right here was the EXACT. SAME. REACTION that I fucking got when I was recovering from my eating disorder.

Folks ENCOURAGED ME TO STARVE MYSELF when I was losing so much weight.

ENCOURAGED ME.

And had nothing but mumbles for me when I called them out on that bullshit years later.

Because we really do not fucking care HOW you got skinny. Just as long as you got skinny and stayed there.

We don’t give no fuck about health. We give a fuck about how fuckable you look to mainstream.

So your ass could have damn near died, but it don’t matter doe, cuz you can fit into a size 6 now.

Concern trolls and thinspo mothafuckers can forever miss me with that bullshit

AMEN.

(Source: shygirl364, via seriouslyamerica)

I once read that life is enduring not only because of the difficulties we encounter, but because of our own innate desire to do better, to overcome challenges, & to self actualize. We can not change anything until we choose to accept it. Condemnation does not liberate, it only oppresses. And coming to consciousness is not possible without infliction or pain.

I get that.

But still…It seems as though moments of happiness will never compare to a continuum of struggle.

One of the great wonders of the conservative movement is how effectively they’ve constructed this inverted narrative in which the rich are victims, and the poor are perpetrators. They’ve managed to convince tens of millions of decent Americans—many of them poor—to ignore any evidence that contradicts this worldview. You can jump up and down and scream, ‘Hey, the Americans who don’t pay income tax are dirt poor, or serve in the military, or are aged!’ Or, ‘Listen, the top ten percent of our country controls 75 percent of our wealth, while the bottom half controls 1.1 percent!’ These are factual statements. But they don’t register. The reality conservatives cling to resides in their hearts. The poor wind up poor not because they lack access to opportunity—to good education and good jobs—or because they lose their jobs, or get sick, but because they’re parasites. The rich are rich not because they were born that way, not because they’ve rigged the system in their favor, or because they’re ruthless or unethical, but because they’re braver and more noble than the rest of us.”—Steve Almond